Can you break ransomware encryption?

Ransomware is a type of malware that encrypts files on a victim’s computer and demands payment to decrypt them. Decrypting encrypted files without paying the ransom is challenging but sometimes possible, depending on the type of ransomware and encryption used.

Table of Contents

What is ransomware and how does it encrypt files?

Ransomware is malicious software that infects a computer, often through phishing emails or drive-by downloads. Once on a system, it searches for and encrypts valuable files such as documents, photos, databases, and other data. The ransomware displays a ransom note demanding payment, usually in cryptocurrency like Bitcoin, in exchange for the decryption key. Without the key, the files remain locked and inaccessible.

There are two main encryption methods used by ransomware:

Symmetric encryption uses the same key to encrypt and decrypt the files. The key is generated on the victim’s computer and essentially acts as the “password” to unlock the files again.
Asymmetric encryption uses a public-private keypair. The public key encrypts the files and only the private key can decrypt them. The private key is retained by the attackers.

In both cases, the encryption is designed to be unbreakable without access to the appropriate decryption key. Paying the ransom is meant to be the only way recover files scrambled by the attack.

Is it possible to decrypt ransomware files without the key?

There are a few ways files encrypted by ransomware can sometimes be recovered without paying the ransom:

Find a decryptor – Security researchers and law enforcement agencies sometimes release free decryption tools for common ransomware strains after finding weaknesses in the encryption algorithms used.
Use backups – Having unaffected backup copies of encrypted files gives you a way to restore your data.

Encrypted key recovery – With symmetric encryption, the key may be recoverable from the victim’s system memory or storage with the right forensic tools.
Flaws in implementation – Weaknesses in how a particular ransomware strain was coded or cryptographic errors made can allow decryption.

However, decryption is not always possible. Newer ransomware tends to use strong, proven encryption correctly implemented, closing off common recovery methods. The most reliable way to regain encrypted data is paying the ransom, though that is not recommended.

Should you pay the ransomware demand?

Paying the ransom is a controversial topic.

Potential benefits of paying include:

Receiving the decryption key to recover files.

Avoiding downtime and productivity losses from not having access to data.
Preventing the attackers from leaking or selling your encrypted data.

Arguments against paying include:

There is no guarantee you will actually get a working decryption key after paying.
Paying encourages and funds criminal operations to continue ransomware campaigns.
Attackers may return to target the victim again since they are known to pay ransoms.

Many security experts advise against paying ransoms for the above reasons. The FBI also discourages paying as it incentivizes more attacks. But ultimately the decision depends on each victim’s specific circumstances. Having reliable backups to restore data makes refusing the ransom more feasible.

How can decryption tools recover ransomware encrypted files?

Security researchers are occasionally able to crack the encryption used by some ransomware variants. This lets them develop free decryption tools to help ransomware victims recover files without paying. There are several technical ways this is achieved:

Find the encryption key – Keys generated on the victim’s system may be recoverable through forensic analysis of the infected device’s memory and storage.

Exploit flaws in cryptography – Weaknesses in the encryption algorithm, such as using insecure random number generators, can allow the decryption key to be calculated.
Reverse engineer the malware – By analyzing the ransomware code, researchers can sometimes extract embedded keys or recreate the encryption process.
Take advantage of mistakes – Implementation errors that fail to properly perform encryption allow recovery of files.

This requires significant expertise, access to ransomware samples, and often luck. But decryption tool repositories such as NoMoreRansom provide free decryptors when available. However, newer ransomware using advanced cryptography is rarely crackable.

What are the limitations of ransomware decryption tools?

While ransomware decryption tools can unlock files for free, there are some important limitations:

Only work for certain strains – A tool typically only applies to a single ransomware variant, not all ransomware.

May not fully decrypt – Recovery success depends on the encryption flaws present, sometimes only partially working.
Requires active development – As new ransomware emerges, ongoing effort is needed to create new tools.
Not available for recent strains – Powerful new ransomware often has robust encryption without weaknesses to exploit for decryption.

Decryptors are most effective against older, simpler ransomware families. The number of strains with decryption tools available is small compared to the amount of ransomware now active globally. Prevention via backups remains the most reliable defense against loss of data.

How can you recover from a ransomware attack?

Recovering from a ransomware infection requires a plan with steps such as:

Disconnect infected devices from any networks to prevent spreading.

Identify the ransomware strain using resources like ID Ransomware.
Check for available decryption tools and try to use them to restore files.
Assess the value of encrypted data and the feasibility of paying the ransom, if no other decryption method exists.

Wipe malware from affected systems and restore data from clean backups.
Strengthen security to prevent reinfection, like installing anti-ransomware software.

With preparation, damage from ransomware can be minimized. Maintaining regular offline backups makes refusing ransom demands more practical. Keeping software patched and updated, blocking suspicious attachments/links, restricting file executions, and monitoring systems help stop infections from happening.

Conclusion

While rarely possible, decrypting ransomware encrypted files without paying cybercriminals provides the best outcome for victims. Security experts endeavor to develop free decryption tools, but reliable solutions only exist for a fraction of ransomware strains.

Preventing infections remains imperative. Affected organizations must weigh the risks, costs, and other options carefully before considering ransom payment. With diligent backup and security protocols, the impact of ransomware can be stemmed without giving in to extortion.

Ransomware strain	Encryption used	Decryption possible?
WannaCry	AES-128-CBC	Yes
Cerber	AES-256-CBC	No
Locky	RSA-2048 and AES-128-CBC	Partially

This table summarizes encryption methods and decryption feasibility for common ransomware strains as an example.

Can security software decrypt ransomware files?

Mainstream consumer antivirus and anti-malware tools cannot decrypt files after a ransomware attack. Their primary function is proactively detecting and blocking malware infections. But a few anti-ransomware security programs have limited decryption capabilities:

Backup copies – Some tools continuously backup files, allowing rollback after ransomware encrypts the live copies.
Behavior monitoring – Suspicious encryption behavior may be detected quickly enough to stop full encryption.

Resident decryption – A few tools have libraries of decryption keys to unlock known ransomware on detection.

However, these decryption technologies have significant limitations:

Narrow coverage – Only useful against known ransomware strains, not new or rare ones.

Partial recovery – Often only repairs a subset of impacted files.
False positives – Legitimate encryption can be misidentified and blocked.

No anti-ransomware product can promise full protection and decryption capability across all attacks. But using these tools in a defense-in-depth strategy does improve resilience. Backing up critical data is still necessary for reliable recovery from ransomware encryption.

What ransomware tactics make decryption difficult?

Modern ransomware uses various tactics intentionally to make decryption very difficult, including:

Strong asymmetric encryption like 2048+ bit RSA keys.
Secure algorithms like AES-256 chosen properly.

Unique victim-specific encryption keys.
Key deletion after use to prevent recovery.
Code obfuscation to avoid analysis.

In combination, these techniques can virtually eliminate any practical way to decrypt files without the private key held by the ransomware operators. Victims have very limited options aside from restoring from backups or paying the ransom.

How can organizations improve resilience against ransomware encryption?

Organizations can strengthen their resilience against ransomware data loss through measures like:

Frequent backups tested for reliability and stored offline.

Employee security awareness training to recognize threats.
Restricting access and software installs on critical systems.
Promptly patching known security vulnerabilities.

Using layered anti-ransomware and antivirus safeguards.
Network segmentation to limit spread of infections.

No single solution can prevent ransomware outright. But combining best practices for cyber hygiene significantly improves the chances of stopping attacks before they can encrypt data. It also ensures alternatives to paying ransoms are available.

Should ransomware payments be banned?

Some argue that banning ransom payments could help deter ransomware attacks. Without the ability to profit, cybercriminals may abandon ransomware campaigns.

However, bans also have potential downsides:

Victims lose one recovery option, which could lead to permanent data loss.

Attackers may leak/sell data if they cannot collect ransoms.
Criminals can continue extorting victims through harder-to-trace cryptocurrencies.
Without incentive to release decryption keys, recovery becomes impossible.

Governments face challenges enforcing bans without causing additional harm. Companies may also ignore bans if essential data remains encrypted. While controversial, bans do raise the risks for attackers, so the idea merits further debate.

How can ransomware victims negotiate a decryption-only payment?

Some ransomware operators are open to negotiating decryption-only payments, where they provide the decryption key but do not demand the victim pays in full.

Ways victims can attempt to negotiate this include:

Communicating inability or refusal to pay the full amount.
Offering to pay a smaller good faith payment for the key only.
Proposing alternative ways to cooperate against common adversaries.

Threatening public exposure or law enforcement action.

However, success depends entirely on the attackers’ willingness to accept such deals. Most ransomware groups seek primarily financial gain, so compelling payment alternatives may be needed for negotiations to work.

What ethical obligations exist around ransomware payments?

Paying ransoms to cybercriminals raises ethical concerns. However, victims face their own moral imperative to recover employees’ work product and keep organizations functioning. There are reasonable counterpoints around ransom payments:

Paying ransoms does provide funds that enable further criminal activity.
But refusing to pay can seriously harm affected businesses and individuals.
Paying encourages more ransomware attacks, causing broad societal damage.

Yet each victim’s situation involves unique circumstances around the decision.

Ethically assessing ransomware payments involves weighing interdependent responsibilities. While rewarding criminals feels morally questionable, victims’ welfare and safety should take priority based on principles of social good.

What legal risks exist around paying ransomware demands?

Paying ransoms potentially involves legal risks such as:

Violating bans – Some governments prohibit ransom payments.
Funding terrorism – Money may assist sanctioned entities.
Money laundering – Transacting with cryptocurrency can raise suspicions.

Negligence – Paying attackers could be viewed as negligent security practice.

However, these risks depend on specific circumstances. Most ransom payments occur in legal gray areas, especially involving foreign cybercriminals. Companies should consult experts to assess risks before paying. But legal theory may be at odds with practical situations victims face.

How has ransomware impacted the cyber insurance industry?

The ransomware epidemic has significantly affected the cyber insurance industry:

Increased demand – Many organizations now seek policies to cover ransomware payments.
Higher premiums – Insurers have raised prices due to increasing claim volumes.
Restricted coverage – Some insurers exclude ransomware or limit payment amounts.

Require safeguards – Policies mandate baseline security measures for eligibility.

While insurance can offset some financial damage from ransomware, coverage varies widely. Deductibles and exclusions often still leave victims with unreimbursed costs. And payments only fix immediate impacts, not the root causes, of successful attacks.