What is an EDR?
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is an integrated endpoint security solution that continuously monitors and collects data from endpoints like laptops, phones, servers, etc. It analyzes this telemetry data in real-time to detect threats, provide visibility into the scope of compromises, and enable rapid response and remediation actions (CrowdStrike).
The key capabilities of EDR include:
- Continuous monitoring and logging of endpoint activity
- Real-time detection of threats and anomalous behavior
- Root cause analysis to understand the full scope of a compromise
- Incident response workflows to contain, investigate and remediate threats
EDR solutions work by deploying lightweight software sensors across endpoints which collect detailed system-level activity data like process execution, registry changes, network connections etc. Advanced analytics and machine learning models analyze this data to detect malicious behaviors and anomalies. When a threat is detected, EDR provides rich forensic data like timelines and event chains to allow security teams to understand the root cause and quickly respond (Trellix).
By providing continuous visibility, real-time detection and rapid response capabilities for endpoints, EDR aims to stop breaches by quickly identifying and isolating advanced threats that evade traditional security tools.
Benefits of EDR
EDR, or Endpoint Detection and Response, solutions provide many benefits for organizations looking to improve their security posture. Some of the key benefits of EDR include:
Improved threat detection – EDR tools use advanced behavioral analysis and machine learning to identify even the most advanced threats that may evade traditional antivirus solutions. EDR provides continuous monitoring and analysis of endpoint activity to detect malicious behavior across an organization’s endpoints.
Faster incident response – With an EDR solution, security teams can quickly isolate infected endpoints to prevent threats from spreading. EDR provides comprehensive visibility and context around threats to accelerate investigation and remediation. Tools like remote shell and file quarantine allow immediate response actions.
More visibility into endpoints – EDR tools collect detailed endpoint telemetry and activity data, giving organizations unmatched visibility into their endpoints. This high fidelity data supports threat hunting, forensics and root cause analysis. Security teams gain insight into risky endpoint behavior and vulnerabilities.
Drawbacks of EDR
While EDR solutions provide enhanced visibility and response capabilities for security teams, they also come with some potential drawbacks. One key downside is cost. EDR solutions can be expensive, with some of the leading commercial platforms costing over $100 per device per year (1). The high cost may put EDR out of reach for organizations with tight security budgets.
In addition to cost, EDR solutions require complex installation and configuration. According to research, over 50% of organizations cite complexity as a key barrier to EDR adoption (1). Proper set up and maintenance of EDR agents across endpoints takes considerable time and expertise. Organizations need staff with specialized EDR knowledge to implement and manage the solution effectively.
False positives represent another common challenge with EDR platforms. The sophisticated detection capabilities of EDR can sometimes misinterpret legitimate system activities as potential threats. This may prompt unnecessary investigation and remediation work, wasting security team time and effort (2). Tuning rules and models to minimize false alerts takes ongoing supervision and analysis.
In summary, top concerns around EDR include high costs, complex deployment, and false positives draining resources. Organizations need to weigh these potential drawbacks against the advanced threat detection benefits EDR can provide.
Sources:
(1) https://www.securus360.com/blog/edr-is-great-but-its-limitations-can-leave-you-open-to-cyberattacks
(2) https://www.kiteworks.com/risk-compliance-glossary/endpoint-detection-response/
Top paid EDR solutions
The EDR market has many established vendors offering robust paid solutions for enterprises. Three of the top paid EDR providers are CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, and Cybereason.
CrowdStrike Falcon is considered a leader in the EDR space and is known for its lightweight agent, cloud-based architecture, and AI-powered threat detection and response capabilities. CrowdStrike provides comprehensive visibility across endpoints and workloads and has a strong focus on proactive hunting for threats. According to Gartner, CrowdStrike “sets the bar for EDR products with its features and vision.” Gartner EDR Solutions Report
SentinelOne is another top EDR vendor praised for its behavioral AI that can detect and autonomously respond to threats in real-time. SentinelOne offers multi-tenancy, cloud scalability, and full visibility across networks, endpoints, cloud workloads, IoT devices, and more. SentinelOne has ranked highly by MITRE Engenuity for its prevention, detection, and response capabilities. Xcitium EDR Vendors Report
Cybereason takes a data-centric approach to EDR with its Malop-hunting engine that detects malicious operations across an organization’s endpoints. Cybereason specializes in spotting adversaries that have breached the perimeter through its focus on uncovering malicious operations. Cybereason offers predictive recommendations to security teams on where to hunt.
Open source EDR options
Several open source EDR solutions exist that provide capable endpoint detection and response functionality at no cost. Three of the most popular open source options include Wazuh, OpenEDR, and Moloch.
Wazuh is an open source EDR that provides host and endpoint monitoring, vulnerability detection, incident response, and regulatory compliance. Key capabilities include real-time endpoint monitoring, log analysis, file integrity monitoring, rootkit detection, and compliance reporting (https://wazuh.com/).
OpenEDR is an open source endpoint detection and response platform that delivers advanced analytics and visualization. It enables continuous endpoint monitoring, automated threat hunting, and incident response. Key features include behavioral analytics, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, AI-driven threat detection, and an investigation workspace (https://www.openedr.com/).
Moloch is an open source large scale packet capturing and indexing system. It provides capabilities for full packet capture indexing, database storage, and fast search for forensic investigation. Moloch is designed for monitoring large networks and enables PCAP capture and storage at scale (https://molo.ch/).
These open source options provide capable EDR functionality without the cost of commercial solutions. For organizations with tight budgets or for individual security researchers, they offer a free path to gain EDR capabilities.
Host-based EDR vs network-based EDR
EDR solutions can be deployed either as host-based agents on endpoints or as network-based sensors that analyze traffic. The key differences between host-based and network-based EDR in terms of detection scope, data sources, and architecture are:
Detection scope – Host-based EDR has visibility into endpoint activity, while network-based EDR monitors network traffic. Host-based EDR can detect threats that don’t propagate over the network. Network-based EDR has a broader view of the network but less insight into endpoint events.https://www.netsurion.com/articles/host-based-versus-network-based-security
Data sources – Host-based EDR uses data from endpoints like processes, registry changes, file activity etc. Network-based EDR relies on network traffic and flows. Host-based EDR has access to more definitive data directly from endpoints.https://www.reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/rcl7up/is_hids_and_edr_the_same_thing/
Architecture – Host-based EDR requires agents on every endpoint. Network-based EDR uses network sensors that can monitor multiple endpoints. Host-based EDR provides richer data but with greater deployment overhead. Network-based EDR is easier to deploy but has less visibility.
Key capabilities to look for in an EDR
When evaluating EDR solutions, there are three core capabilities to look for:
Detection
EDR tools should provide continuous monitoring and analysis to detect potential threats across endpoints. Key detection capabilities include:
- Behavior-based analytics to identify anomalous activity that may indicate an attack
- Signature-based detection of known indicators of compromise
- Machine learning models to detect emerging and unknown threats
- Integration with threat intelligence feeds for real-time updates on new vulnerabilities and malware
According to Gartner, advanced detection techniques like behavioral analytics are a must-have for robust EDR solutions (source).
Investigation
Once a potential threat is detected, EDR tools should support swift investigation to determine if it represents a real security incident. Key capabilities include:
- Centralized visibility into endpoint activity enterprise-wide
- Tools to search historical endpoint data quickly
- Contextual information about threats and affected assets
- Incident timelines and visualizations
Per CrowdStrike, efficient investigation is critical for minimizing dwell time and stopping attacks (source).
Response
Once validated, incidents require swift containment and remediation. EDR tools should facilitate:
- Remote isolation of infected endpoints
- Quarantining of malicious files
- Blocking of attacker communications
- Automated implementation of standard response playbooks
- Integration with SOAR platforms for workflow automation
As per Qualys, automated response capabilities are becoming essential for EDR (source).
Integrating EDR with other tools
Integrating EDR with other security solutions like SIEM, firewalls, and threat intelligence platforms can provide stronger protection and visibility across an organization’s infrastructure. According to a Cynet blog post, integrating EDR with a SIEM solution enables improved threat detection by correlating insights from endpoints with network and log data.
For example, if suspicious activity is detected on an endpoint, the integrated SIEM could provide additional context by checking network traffic logs and identifying communication with known bad IPs, per a IT Convergence article. Similarly, integrating with threat intel feeds allows suspicious file hashes and IOCs observed on endpoints to be cross-referenced, helping confirm malware. Integrating firewall logs would give visibility into connections associated with compromised endpoints.
Overall, combining EDR with solutions like SIEM, firewalls, and threat intel enables faster threat validation, more comprehensive incident response, and strengthened defenses. Organizations should evaluate integration capabilities when selecting an EDR vendor.
Choosing the right EDR
With the wide variety of EDR solutions on the market, it can be challenging to determine which one is the best fit for your organization’s needs and budget. When evaluating EDR tools, be sure to carefully assess the key features, costs, performance benchmarks, and company reputation.
Important EDR capabilities to evaluate include detection methods, threat intelligence integration, automated response options, and native integrations with other security tools you already leverage. Thoroughly test detection and response performance against the latest threats through product demos and trials. Examine the total cost of ownership including license fees, deployment costs, and ongoing maintenance and support.
Research the vendor’s financial standing, customer base, length of time in business, and partnerships with technology leaders. Look for positive analyst reviews of the product and talk to peer references to get candid feedback on their experiences. Prioritize solutions with a track record of consistent innovation balanced with stability.
Take advantage of free trials and pilots before fully committing. Get hands-on experience with the EDR console and workflows. Assess how easy or difficult it is for your team to use on a daily basis. Configure custom detections and run attack simulations to validate performance, minimize false positives, and optimize alert triage.
Choosing the right EDR takes research and testing, but picking a solution that aligns with your organization’s security priorities and operational needs is key to getting the most value.
Conclusion
In summary, EDR solutions provide valuable visibility and response capabilities for security threats in an organization’s environment. While paid solutions often provide more advanced features, open source EDR tools have matured considerably and can offer a viable free alternative for organizations with limited security budgets.
When evaluating free EDR options, be sure to consider capabilities like behavioral analysis, endpoint visibility, detection of advanced threats, automated response actions, integrations with other security tools, and ease of deployment and management. Focus on finding a solution that provides the threat detection, investigation and response capabilities that are most important for your organization.
For organizations that want a full-featured free EDR, Osquery and Wazuh stand out as two of the most capable options to consider. Both are open source, have active development communities, and provide functionality like file integrity monitoring, telemetry collection, alerting and visualization. Overall, free EDR tools now provide sufficient capabilities for basic threat hunting, incident response and IT operations use cases.