What RAID can use 3 drives?

There are several RAID configurations that can utilize 3 drives. The most common options are RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, and RAID 10. Each configuration offers different benefits and tradeoffs in terms of performance, redundancy, and storage efficiency.


RAID 0, also known as disk striping, spreads data evenly across all drives with no parity or redundancy. This allows for the fastest read and write speeds but offers no protection against drive failures. With 3 drives in a RAID 0 configuration, the total storage capacity equals the sum of all drives. For example, three 1TB drives would provide 3TB total in a 3 drive RAID 0 array.


RAID 1, known as disk mirroring, duplicates data across all drives to provide full redundancy. If one drive fails, the data remains intact on the other mirrored drives. With 3 drives, the usable capacity with RAID 1 is only equal to the size of 1 drive. For example, three 1TB drives would result in 1TB total usable storage. The advantage of RAID 1 is complete data protection and improved read speeds, at the cost of available storage and slower writes.


RAID 5 stripes data and distributes parity information across all drives. It requires a minimum of 3 drives to implement. With 3 drives in RAID 5, the total usable capacity is equal to the size of (number of drives – 1). So for 3 x 1TB drives, the usable space would be 2TB. The advantage of RAID 5 is good read performance, the ability to survive a single drive failure, and efficient use of storage. The downside is slower write speeds due to parity calculation.


RAID 10 is a nested, or hybrid RAID level that combines mirroring and striping for both performance and redundancy. With 3 drives, RAID 10 would mirror a pair of drives and stripe data across the mirrors. This provides full redundancy and protects against a single drive failure. Total usable capacity with 3 drives in RAID 10 would be equal to the size of 1 drive. Just like with 3-drive RAID 1, three 1TB drives would result in 1TB total usable storage. RAID 10 requires an even number of drives, so a minimum of 4 drives is recommended.

Comparison of 3-Drive RAID Performance

RAID Type Read Speed Write Speed Redundancy Capacity Efficiency
RAID 0 Excellent Excellent None 100%
RAID 1 Good Slow Full 33%
RAID 5 Good Slow Single Drive 67%
RAID 10 Good Slow Full 33%

This table summarizes the key performance differences between the main RAID types that can be implemented with 3 drives. RAID 0 provides the fastest speed but no redundancy, while RAID 1 and RAID 10 offer full redundancy at the cost of slower writes and less total capacity. RAID 5 strikes a balance with modest speed, single drive fault tolerance, and 67% efficiency.

Ideal Uses for 3-Drive RAID Configurations

Here are some ideal usage scenarios for the various 3-drive RAID configurations:

  • RAID 0 – Media editing, video production, applications needing maximum speed
  • RAID 1 – Critical data protection, transactional databases, mission critical systems
  • RAID 5 – General purpose file and application servers, backups
  • RAID 10 – High performance with full redundancy, virtualization, email servers

RAID Controller Requirements

To implement RAID with drives, a RAID controller is required. This can be a dedicated hardware RAID card, RAID software built into the operating system, or fake/soft RAID done by the system BIOS or firmware. Most modern desktop, workstation, and server motherboards have built-in RAID support these days. Many operating systems like Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, etc. also have software RAID drivers available.

Drive Interface and Bus Considerations

3-drive RAID can utilize any drive interface, but higher throughput interfaces like SATA III or SAS are recommended, especially for RAID 0 and 10. The speed of the drive bus or connection to the RAID controller should also be considered. For optimal performance, PCIe or Direct Attached Storage (DAS) connections are preferred over USB or NAS.

Matching Drives

For RAID configurations that stripe or mirror data across drives, it is best to use identical drives in terms of capacity, speed, and type. Mixing HDDs and SSDs in the same array can negatively impact performance. The RAID volume is limited by the capacity of the smallest drive. Using matched drives avoids any of these potential issues.

Expanding RAID Arrays

Most RAID implementations allow arrays to be expanded by adding additional drives. For RAID types like RAID 5, expanding the array also expands the total capacity. For RAID 0 and 10, expanding the drive count can improve performance by increasing parallelism. Adding drives to triple drive RAID 1 or RAID 10 arrays will result in additional mirrored pairs or stripes.

Rebuilding Failed Drives

In redundant RAID configurations like RAID 1, 5, and 10, failed drives can be replaced and the data rebuilt. Rebuilding utilizes the redundant data on the other drives to restore data to the replacement drive. The larger the drives, the longer the rebuild takes. Replacements should be the same size or larger than the failed drive.

Migrating RAID Levels

Some RAID implementations allow arrays to be migrated between levels without losing data, as long as the new level supports the number of drives. For example, a 3 drive RAID 5 array could be migrated to a 3 drive RAID 0 array. Going from RAID 0 to any redundant RAID type would cause data loss however.

Drive Failure Impacts

The impact of a failed drive depends on the RAID level. For RAID 0, any drive failure will result in full data loss. For RAID 1 and 10, a single drive failure has no impact outside of reduced redundancy until the failed drive is replaced and rebuilt. With RAID 5, a single drive failure does not result in data loss. But a second drive failure before rebuilding the first will cause full data loss. Redundant RAID levels provide a window to replace failed drives.

Caveats of Software RAID

While software RAID provides convenience, it has some limitations compared to hardware RAID:

  • Uses system CPU resources for RAID tasks like parity calculation
  • No battery backed write cache for improved write performance
  • Limited portability between operating system installs
  • No monitoring capabilities for drive health and status

For mission critical RAID implementations, hardware RAID cards are recommended whenever possible for these reasons.

Choosing the Optimal RAID Level

There are several factors to consider when choosing the appropriate RAID level and configuration:

  • Application performance requirements – RAID 0 provides the fastest speed for highly demanding applications
  • Redundancy needs – RAID 1 and 10 offer the most redundancy and protection
  • Available drives – At least 3 are required for RAID 5, with 4 recommended for RAID 10
  • Drive cost – RAID types like RAID 0 and 5 provide more efficient use of storage
  • I/O profile – Lots of writes favor RAID levels with parity/mirroring for slower writes

Striking the right balance for a particular use case depends on each of these considerations. Benchmarking different configurations with representative workloads is recommended whenever possible.


RAID 0, 1, 5, and 10 are good options for creating a RAID array with 3 drives. RAID 0 provides maximum performance at the cost of no redundancy. RAID 1 and 10 offer full redundancy through mirroring but limit usable capacity. RAID 5 balances performance, redundancy, and storage efficiency. The optimal choice comes down to the performance, redundancy, and capacity needs for a particular use case.