Is flash storage better than SSD?

Flash storage and solid-state drives (SSDs) are two of the most popular types of high-speed, non-volatile storage options for PCs and data centers. Both flash and SSDs offer much faster read/write speeds and lower latency compared to traditional hard disk drives (HDDs). However, there are some key differences between flash and SSDs when it comes to performance, endurance, use cases, and cost.

What is Flash Storage?

Flash storage refers to any solid state storage device that uses flash memory chips to store data. Some common examples of flash storage include USB flash drives, memory cards, and embedded multimedia cards (eMMC). Flash storage uses NAND flash memory chips that can be electrically erased and reprogrammed. This makes them non-volatile, meaning data is retained even when power is removed. The lack of moving parts provides faster access times and better shock resistance compared to traditional HDDs.

Flash storage devices connect to a computer through standard interfaces like USB, SD card slots, or SATA. Low-capacity flash drives utilize a single NAND chip while high capacity drives may use multiple chips synchronized by a controller. Flash memory provides much better random access performance compared to HDDs because data can be accessed directly from any location versus needing to move the read/write heads to the correct position.

What is an SSD?

A solid-state drive or SSD is type of flash storage designed to replace traditional hard disk drives in computers and servers. SSDs utilize NAND flash memory chips just like USB drives or memory cards, but are designed to be plugged directly into SATA, SAS or PCIe slots on a computer’s motherboard. This allows the SSD to act as a computer’s primary storage drive like a traditional HDD.

SSDs incorporate a controller which manages all communications between the flash memory and computer. The controller packages the NAND flash memory chips into standardized form factors that can be slotted into computer drive bays. Common 2.5″ and M.2 SSD form factors allow easy installation as a primary OS boot drive or for additional internal storage. The controller also manages critical OS storage functions like mapping data locations, garbage collection, wear leveling, caching, error correction, and encryption.

Flash vs SSD Performance

Both flash storage devices and SSDs provide much faster data access compared to traditional hard drives. However, SSDs tend to have significantly better sustained read/write speeds and latency when acting as a primary storage drive:

Sequential Read/Write Speed

This measures the performance when reading/writing large contiguous blocks of data. SSDs excel at sequential transfers with sustained read/write speeds of 500-3500+ MB/s depending on the generation of PCIe or SATA interface used. Standard flash drives peak at around 500 MB/s read and less than half of that for writes.

Random Read/Write Speed

This measures I/O performance when accessing small, random data chunks. Again, SSDs are much faster with performance of up to 700K+ IOPS compared to flash drives capable of around 10-20K IOPS. The parallelism of accessing multiple NAND dies improves SSD random access.


The delay before data can be accessed, measured in microseconds. SSDs offer ultra-low latency of 10-100 microseconds. Flash drives are typically around 500-1000+ microseconds.

Why are SSDs faster than portable flash storage? SSDs utilize:

  • High-performance controllers designed for primary storage.
  • Advanced firmware algorithms like hybrid SLC/MLC caching.
  • Multi-channel architectures accessing multiple NAND chips/dies in parallel.
  • More channels connecting more flash memory chips together.
  • Faster SATA 3.0 and PCIe host interfaces designed for system storage vs. USB 3.0 or SD cards in flash drives.

In summary, while the underlying flash memory chips may be similar, SSDs offer higher performance by optimizing the architecture for low-latency, high-speed data access as system storage.

Flash vs SSD Endurance

Endurance refers to the amount of writes that can be performed before flash memory wears out and loses the ability to store data reliably. Here is how flash and SSD endurance compare:

Flash Drive Endurance

Typical flash drives can withstand 500-5,000 write cycles before wearing out. However, endurance varies widely depending on the quality of NAND flash chips used:

  • TLC NAND: 300-1,000 cycles
  • MLC NAND: 3,000-5,000 cycles
  • SLC NAND: 10,000+ cycles

Most low-cost USB flash drives use less durable TLC NAND optimized for low cost versus endurance. Premium drives may use MLC or SLC NAND chips with up to 10X higher endurance. The controller implements wear leveling algorithms to spread writes across all cells evenly.

SSD Endurance

SSDs designed for heavy workloads offer much higher write endurance, typically in the range of 150 TBW to over 5 PBW+:

  • Client/consumer SSDs: 150-600 TBW
  • Workstation SSDs: 1-10 PBW
  • Enterprise SSDs: 5-40+ PBW

High-endurance SSDs leverage advanced controllers along with SLC caching, overprovisioning, and other firmware features to extend drive life well beyond most flash devices. However, SSD write endurance still doesn’t match the unlimited writes of HDDs which must be considered for certain write-heavy workloads.

Flash vs SSD Use Cases

Due to the differences in performance, endurance, and capabilities – flash storage and SSDs tend to be used for different purposes:

Flash Storage Use Cases

  • Removable storage for personal files, photos, videos
  • Transferring data between devices and systems
  • Storing software, OS images, recovery backups
  • Caching, buffering, tertiary storage

Flash drives are commonly used by individuals for portable storage and file transfer. Their compact form factor allows easy physical transport and access across multiple devices. Flash storage is also popular for distributing software images, bootable OS installers, caching, firmware updates, and other secondary storage uses where high endurance is not critical.

SSD Use Cases

  • Primary OS boot drive
  • High-performance storage tier
  • Latency-sensitive applications (databases, analytics)
  • Noisy, harsh, mobile environment

SSDs excel as primary storage replacing HDDs as the boot volume for PCs and servers. The performance benefits of flash transform system responsiveness for both consumer and business computing. SSDs are also deployed in performance-sensitive roles accessing frequently used data and demanding low latency response times.

The shock resistance and low power requirements also make SSDs well suited for rugged, embedded systems in the automotive, aerospace, industrial, and defense industries.

Comparison Flash Storage SSD
Interface USB, SD, SATA SATA, PCIe, proprietary
Use Cases Removable storage, file transfer, secondary storage Primary storage, boot drives, high performance applications
Sequential Read Speed Up to 500 MB/s 500 – 3500+ MB/s
Random Read Speed 10-20K IOPS 10K – 700K+ IOPS
Endurance 300 – 10,000 cycles 150 TBW – 40+ PBW

Cost Comparison of Flash vs SSD

Pricing also differs substantially between flash drives and SSDs:

Flash Drive Cost

Small USB flash drives commonly cost around $5-10 for 16-64GB. Larger 256-512GB thumb drives range from $25-50. High-performance portable SSDs with USB 3.2 or Thunderbolt interfaces can run $100-250 and offer maximal speeds around 1 GB/s.

SSD Cost

SSDs carry a higher cost than flash drives, but have dropped substantially in price over the years:

  • SATA consumer SSDs: $0.10-0.20/GB
  • M.2 NVMe SSDs: $0.15-0.30/GB
  • Enterprise SSDs: $0.50-2.00/GB

For equivalent capacities, SSDs still cost around 2-5X more than flash drives. However, the performance and endurance improvements make SSDs well worth the premium for primary or high performance storage roles.


In summary, while flash storage and SSDs both utilize NAND flash memory, SSDs offer clear advantages in speed, latency, endurance, and capabilities more suitable as primary storage in computers and servers. The higher cost of SSDs is often easily justified by the order-of-magnitude performance gains compared to hard disk drives. For portable storage and basic file transfer roles, inexpensive flash drives still work well.

SSDs have clearly become the standard for system storage from personal laptops up to enterprise data centers. The rapidly declining cost of SSDs along with the performance limitations of HDDs will likely lead to flash continuing to displace spinning hard disks for an expanding range of storage applications.