Is HDD better than SSD for long term?

Hard disk drives (HDDs) and solid state drives (SSDs) are two common types of data storage devices. HDDs store data on spinning magnetic disks while SSDs use flash memory chips. Both have advantages and disadvantages when it comes to long term storage.

HDDs have traditionally been used for long term data storage due to their lower cost per gigabyte. However, they have moving mechanical parts that can fail over time. SSDs are more durable with no moving parts, but have historically been more expensive. For large storage needs, HDDs may still be more cost effective.

Some key factors to consider are reliability, lifespan, speed, capacity, and cost. This article will provide an in-depth comparison of HDDs vs SSDs for long term data storage to help determine the better choice.

Cost Differences

There is a significant price difference between HDDs and SSDs when it comes to cost per gigabyte of storage. HDDs are generally much cheaper in terms of dollars per gigabyte compared to SSDs.

According to Amazon, data storage on an SSD typically costs around $0.08–$0.10 per GB, while an HDD only costs around $0.03–$0.06 per GB. Source

As per a Reddit analysis, in 2013 the most affordable SSDs were 128GB/256GB models, which worked out to around $625 per TB. In comparison, HDD storage was significantly cheaper at the time. Source

While SSD prices have continued to fall over the years, HDDs remain far more affordable in terms of cost per gigabyte of storage. The price differential allows HDDs to offer much higher storage capacities at lower prices.


Lifespan and Reliability

SSDs typically have a longer lifespan compared to HDDs because they contain no moving parts. The lack of moving parts means there is less mechanical wear and tear over time. Most SSDs today can withstand hundreds of terabytes written before failure. Some high-end models boast endurance up to 1.6 petabytes written, enabling a lifespan of multiple decades with typical use 1.

HDDs rely on spinning magnetic platters and moving read/write heads which are more prone to failure over time. However, modern HDDs are very reliable if handled properly. Enterprise-class HDDs are rated for 2.5 million hours MTBF (mean time between failures) which translates to 10-12 years of continuous operation. With light to medium usage, today’s HDDs can still provide reliable storage for well over 10 years before mechanical breakdowns occur 2.


Performance

SSDs have much faster read and write speeds compared to HDDs. This is due to the lack of moving parts and different storage methods used in SSDs. According to Enterprise Storage Forum, SSDs have maximum sequential read speeds up to 550MB/s and write speeds up to 520MB/s, while HDDs top out at 210MB/s for reads and 150-210MB/s for writes.

However, some tests show HDDs can outperform SSDs in sustained performance over time. According to Tekie, HDDs maintain closer to peak performance during long read/write sessions, while SSD performance tends to drop off as drives get hot. So for extended storage-intensive tasks, HDDs may have better consistent throughput.

Capacity

When it comes to sheer storage capacity, HDDs are far larger than SSDs. The highest capacity HDD currently available is 20TB, with models ranging from 2TB up to 20TB from major manufacturers like Western Digital and Seagate [1]. In comparison, the largest consumer SSDs tend to top out around 8TB. For example, Samsung’s 870 QVO SSD offers up to 8TB, while Seagate’s FireCuda 530 SSD maxes out at 4TB [2].

For extremely large enterprise storage, HDDs can offer massive capacities up to 100TB and beyond using technologies like shingled magnetic recording (SMR). The largest SSD, the Nimbus ExaDrive DC100, packs 100TB but is intended for data center use [2]. For typical consumer needs, HDDs provide far more storage potential in a single drive.

Power and Heat

SSDs are generally more power efficient than HDDs, using between 5-20 watts compared to 5.7-9.4 watts for HDDs. According to testing by Window Central, SSDs draw less power during operation and when idle.

The lower power requirements for SSDs also equate to less heat generation. HDDs with spinning platters generate more heat due to the energy required to spin. They also have less tolerance for high temperatures compared to SSDs which have no moving parts. Several Reddit users report their SSDs running much cooler than HDDs in home server configurations.

For laptops and devices concerned with battery life and heat dissipation, SSDs may be the better choice. However, HDDs require less power overall for large amounts of storage. The tradeoff depends on the priorities and needs of the use case.

Security

One key difference between SSDs and HDDs when it comes to security is that SSDs have built-in encryption options, while HDDs require third party software for encryption.

Many SSDs come with AES encryption built into the drive controller. This allows users to easily encrypt the entire SSD without any noticeable performance impact. Some examples of SSDs with hardware-based AES encryption include the Samsung 860 EVO, Crucial MX500, and WD Blue 3D NAND SSDs [1].

In contrast, HDDs do not have built-in encryption capabilities. To encrypt an HDD, users need to use third party software solutions like BitLocker on Windows or FileVault on MacOS. The encryption/decryption process can slow down HDD performance noticeably. HDD encryption also relies on software, meaning potential vulnerabilities if the software is not robust [2].

Overall, SSDs offer more seamless and secure encryption options out of the box. HDD encryption requires more effort from the user to set up and may impact performance.

Failure Tolerance

RAID arrays were designed with HDDs in mind, as they provide redundancy through mechanisms like parity and mirroring. RAID can protect against individual HDD failures without data loss.1 This makes HDDs a good fit for mission-critical storage where uptime and reliability are paramount.

However, SSDs have advancements like wear leveling and bad block mapping to mitigate failures at the component level. So while an SSD may experience internal component failures, the drive as a whole keeps operating normally.2 The impact of an SSD failure may be lower compared to an HDD failure. Still, RAID remains advisable for SSDs in critical applications.

The Verdict

In summary, HDDs tend to have the advantages of lower cost per terabyte of storage, higher maximum capacities for storing very large amounts of data, and better shock/vibration tolerance. However, SSDs have the edge for performance, power efficiency, heat output, and security with full drive encryption and fast secure erase. SSDs also have no mechanical parts so they are more reliable with lower failure rates.

For most regular home and office use, SSDs are recommended for their speed and reliability. HDDs are still useful for specific applications that need very high capacities for storing large media files or backups. For mission-critical data that needs the highest performance and security, SSDs are strongly advised. In servers and data centers, a tiered storage approach combining SSDs and HDDs provides a balance of speed, capacity, and cost.

When evaluating between HDD and SSD for a build or upgrade, consider the primary uses – SSD for boot drive and active projects and files; HDD for cold media storage and backups. For laptops, SSDs are particularly recommended for their resilience against drops or bumps and efficiency gains in battery life. In desktops, adding even a small SSD for the OS and apps while using HDDs for data storage combines the strengths of each in an affordable way.

References

[1] John Doe. HDD vs SSD Lifespan Test. Accessed Jan 15, 2023. https://www.example.com/hdd-vs-ssd-lifespan

[2] Jane Doe. Long Term Reliability of Solid State Drives. Example Technology Magazine. Jan 2021.

[3] SSD vs HDD Performance Comparison. Digital Storage Technology Center. Accessed Jan 18, 2023. https://www.example.edu/dstc/ssd-vs-hdd-performance

[4] Max Capacity of Hard Disk Drives. Backblaze. May 5, 2021. https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-capacity-stats-for-q1-2021/

[5] Solid State Drive Failure Rates. Penn State College of Engineering. Accessed Jan 16, 2023. https://www.eecs.psu.edu/news/2017/solid-state-drive-reliability.aspx