Is it a good idea to have RAID 0?

RAID 0, also known as disk striping, is a method of configuring multiple hard drives to work together as one large drive. The main benefits of RAID 0 are increased disk performance and storage space. However, RAID 0 also comes with some drawbacks, mainly regarding reliability and data recovery.

What is RAID 0?

RAID stands for Redundant Array of Independent Disks. RAID 0 is a level of RAID that implements striping, which means data is split across multiple hard drives. For example, on a two-drive RAID 0 array, the first drive would store all the odd numbered blocks of data while the second drive would store all the even numbered blocks of data. This allows read and write operations to be performed in parallel, improving overall performance.

Because data is split between drives, the total storage capacity of a RAID 0 array is equal to the sum of all the drives. So two 1TB drives in RAID 0 would provide 2TB of total space. This makes RAID 0 useful for situations where maximum storage capacity and performance are needed.

Benefits of RAID 0

Here are some of the main benefits of using RAID 0:

  • Increased disk performance – By splitting and distributing data across multiple drives, RAID 0 can provide significant improvements to I/O performance. Read and write operations occur in parallel, providing faster data transfers.
  • Added storage space – Total capacity is equal to the sum of all drives. Two 1TB drives provides 2TB total in RAID 0.
  • Simple configuration – RAID 0 is easy to set up, requiring no parity calculation like in RAID 5 or 6. The controller simply stripes data equally across disks.

For tasks like video editing, RAID 0 can provide a nice performance boost thanks to the improved throughput. The doubled capacity is also beneficial for storing large files and archives.

Drawbacks of RAID 0

Using RAID 0 also comes with some downsides to consider:

  • No fault tolerance – Since RAID 0 does not duplicate data across drives, there is no fault tolerance or redundancy. If one drive fails, all data across the RAID 0 array will be lost.
  • Increased risk of failure – The probability of array failure is equal to the sum of all the individual drive failure rates. More disks means higher risk.
  • No recovery from drive failure – It is not possible to rebuild a RAID 0 array after a disk fails. A backup is required to restore lost data.
  • Lower security – Splitting data across drives can create data remanence issues if one drive is stolen or disposed of.

Critical business data or other important files should not be stored on RAID 0 due to the lack of redundancy. Regular backups are essential.

Is RAID 0 Safe for the Operating System?

Using RAID 0 for an operating system drive is generally not recommended. Because the OS cannot boot if any part of it is corrupted or missing, the redundancy of at least RAID 1 is advised for improved security and bootability.

However, in some cases RAID 0 can provide noticeably faster boot and application launch times compared to a single drive. The risks must be considered carefully, but RAID 0 can work for an OS drive in certain situations:

  • Non-critical systems where reinstalling the OS is easy
  • Frequently imaging the OS to backup drives as a safety net
  • Using high quality enterprise-grade drives that have low failure rates
  • Storing data backups externally from the RAID 0 array

Running the OS on RAID 0 trades safety for performance. Make sure the risks are justified by the use case.

Is RAID 0 Faster than a Single Drive?

In most cases, yes RAID 0 will provide better performance than a single drive. By distributing read and write activity across multiple disks, total throughput is multiplied compared to a single disk.

However, a number of factors can affect the real-world speed boost RAID 0 provides:

  • Drive interface – RAID 0 is most beneficial with faster drive interfaces like SATA/SAS SSDs rather than HDDs.
  • Drive capacity – Larger drives reduce the impact of the performance gain from striping data.
  • Data access patterns – Random I/O benefits more than sequential I/O.
  • Controller architecture – Hardware RAID cards remove load from the CPU.
  • Number of drives – More drives increase parallelism for better performance.

In synthetic benchmarks, RAID 0 can often double the throughput of a single drive. But for general usage, the speedup may be less pronounced depending on the combination of factors.

RAID 0 vs RAID 1 Performance

Comparing RAID 0 vs RAID 1 performance:

  • RAID 0 is faster for reads since data is split across multiple disks. RAID 1 is slower due to mirroring.
  • RAID 0 can be faster for writes depending on the controller. RAID 1 writes must be duplicated, affecting performance.
  • RAID 0 has higher throughput while RAID 1 reduces throughput for redundancy.
  • Both RAID levels provide quicker access to small chunks of data.

In most cases, RAID 0 will outperform RAID 1 in terms of overall read and write speed. But RAID 1 provides much better data protection in the event of a disk failure.

Ideal RAID 0 Use Cases

Here are some examples of ideal usage scenarios for implementing a RAID 0 array:

  • Media storage and editing – Video/photo editors who need fast scratch disks to store temporary media files can benefit from RAID 0’s performance and capacity.
  • Virtual machines – Hypervisors running many VMs can take advantage of RAID 0 across multiple SSDs for optimal speed.
  • Gaming PCs – High performance RAID 0 arrays help load game assets faster from storage.
  • Database servers – Frequently accessed data sees quicker response times from striped arrays.
  • High throughput backups – Large backup sets can be streamed faster to RAID 0 destination storage.

Any environment where maximum disk performance is critical is a good candidate for deploying a RAID 0 array. Just be sure to factor in the increased risk and implement sufficient data protection.

Minimum Number of Drives for RAID 0

The minimum number of disks required to create a RAID 0 array is two drives. With only one drive, striping data is not possible so normal single drive behavior results. Two disks is the starting point for enabling RAID 0 parallelism and performance benefits.

While two disk RAID 0 arrays are common for simplicity, using additional drives can increase performance. Four-disk and eight-disk RAID 0 setups are common for high throughput needs. More drives allow data chunks to be split into smaller sections for finer parallelism granularity.

RAID 0 Array Management Best Practices

To maximize RAID 0 performance and life expectancy, follow these best practices:

  • Use identical drives in terms of model, capacity, and age. Mixing drives increases chances of failure.
  • Enable drive caching (write-back cache) for better write speeds.
  • Replace drives proactively as they age to reduce risk of failure.
  • Monitor drive health metrics using SMART data.
  • Keep firmware and drivers up to date to fix bugs and performance issues.
  • Spread I/O activity across many disks by staggering data placement.
  • Use enterprise-class SSDs for better performance, life expectancy, and data retention at rest.

Testing recoverability using backups is also wise to verify data can be restored before disaster strikes. Take care and RAID 0 can deliver big performance reliably.

Recovering Data from Failed RAID 0

Recovering data from a failed RAID 0 array is often impossible if no backups exist. Because striping scatters data across all disks with no redundancy, the failure of just one drive will result in full array damage and data loss.

However, there are some cases where partial RAID 0 recovery may be possible:

  • If the RAID controller metadata is still intact, drives may be rebuilt into a degraded array allowing access to still working disks. Data reconstruction software can then try to recover files.
  • If a drive has technically failed but still spins, data recovery software may be able to bypass the controller and scan sectors pulling off accessible data.
  • Forensic Analysis on the failed drive platters may reconstruct some data fragments, but is expensive and not guaranteed.

These methods are not reliable and often yield little to no data. RAID 0 recovery has very low success rates compared to protected RAID levels. Always maintain backups.

Conclusion

RAID 0 can deliver improved performance and increased storage capacity by striping data evenly across multiple drives. But this comes at the cost of fault tolerance – losing one drive means the full array fails. Before implementing RAID 0, consider if the speed benefits outweigh the lack of redundancy for your usage. Combine RAID 0 with comprehensive backups for the best experience.