Why is it important to preserve digital evidence?

Digital evidence plays a crucial role in criminal investigations and legal proceedings today. As we increasingly communicate, shop, bank, and live our lives online, our digital devices and activities generate huge amounts of data that can serve as evidence of crimes or civil disputes. However, digital evidence presents unique challenges compared to physical evidence. If not properly preserved and handled, it can easily be altered, damaged, or destroyed.

What is digital evidence?

Digital evidence encompasses any data stored or transmitted using a digital device that contains information that may be relevant to an investigation or legal case. This includes:

  • Files on computers, laptops, tablets, and smartphones, such as documents, emails, text messages, photos, videos, and internet browsing history.
  • Data generated by and stored on IoT devices like fitness trackers, smart home assistants, vehicle infotainment systems, and home security cameras.
  • Activity logs, access records, metadata, and configuration files from networks, databases, and applications.
  • Social media content and activity, including posts, messages, likes, shares, and geolocation data.
  • Cloud storage files, drive activity logs, and metadata.
  • Digital wallet and cryptocurrency transaction records.

Essentially any data stored or processed digitally could become evidence if relevant to a case.

Why is preserving digital evidence important?

There are several key reasons properly preserving digital evidence is crucial:

  • Digital evidence is fragile: It can be inadvertently modified or corrupted if not handled correctly. Proper preservation maintains integrity.
  • Digital evidence is volatile: It can be easily deleted, overwritten, or lost if not captured quickly. Preservation retains access.
  • Chain of custody: Meticulous handling procedures authenticate digital evidence and verify it is unaltered.
  • Recover hidden data: Special preservation techniques can retrieve deleted or obscured data.
  • Stand up in court: Following evidence handling best practices verifies reliability and admissibility.

Without proper preservation, critical case evidence could be compromised or ruled inadmissible in court. Preservation techniques and chain of custody processes applied from the start of an investigation help maintain evidentiary value and integrity.

How does digital evidence get altered or corrupted?

Digital evidence is inherently unstable and can easily be changed, damaged, or destroyed intentionally or accidentally. Common risks include:

  • Intentional deletion: Suspects deleting incriminating files and data.
  • Concealment: Criminals hiding, encrypting, or obscuring data.
  • Data overwriting: Old data getting overwritten by new data during routine use.
  • Damage: Physical damage of storage media destroying data.
  • Malware: Viruses, ransomware, and other malware altering or encrypting data.
  • File corruption: Software bugs or crashes causing file errors.
  • Format and reinstallation: Wiping a device’s data by reformatting or reinstalling the operating system.

Maintaining control over a digital device and strictly following evidence handling procedures reduces these risks until proper preservation methods can be applied.

What are the main goals of digital evidence preservation?

Digital evidence preservation aims to achieve several key goals:

  • Acquire evidence: Securely obtain custody of digital devices and data.
  • Authenticate: Confirm no changes occurred since acquisition.
  • Isolate: Safeguard evidence from tampering, damage, or loss.
  • Document: Record a detailed chain of custody.
  • Notify: Inform necessary parties like legal counsel.
  • Analyze: Extract and interpret relevant evidence.
  • Preserve: Maintain long-term accessibility and integrity.

Following best practices for achieving these goals helps satisfy legal requirements for introducing reliable digital evidence in investigations and court proceedings.

What are the main methods used to preserve digital evidence?

Key digital evidence preservation techniques include:

  • Isolation: Removing devices from networks and preventing access.
  • Packaging: Carefully storing devices to avoid physical damage.
  • Imaging: Making forensically sound copies of data.
  • Chain of custody documentation: Recording everyone handling evidence.
  • Hashing: Generating digital fingerprints to authenticate copies.
  • Encryption: Password protecting copied data.
  • Secure storage: Storing images and drives read-only in access-controlled locations.

Investigators use combinations of these techniques tailored to case circumstances and evidence requirements. Processes are carefully designed to maintain proper chain of custody without altering data.

How does imaging preserve digital evidence?

Forensic imaging makes an exact, sector-by-sector copy of a digital storage medium like a hard drive or flash memory card. Imaging accomplishes several key preservation goals:

  • Duplicates every byte of data without alterations.
  • Captures all active files, deleted files, corrupted data, and file system metadata.
  • Preserves original storage device condition, timestamps, and access dates.
  • Allows analysis of evidence without tampering with original data.
  • Provides backup copies to protect against data loss.

Imaging is considered the gold standard for reliably duplicating digital evidence for analysis and long-term preservation. Best practices include cryptographic hashing and strict procedures to verify imaging integrity and chain of custody.

What role does cryptographic hashing play in digital evidence preservation?

Cryptographic hashes like MD5, SHA-1, and SHA-256 generate unique alphanumeric sequences representing digital data. Hashing provides two critical preservation functions:

  • Verifying authenticity: Matching hashes of original data and copies proves no changes occurred.
  • Detecting tampering: Any alteration generates a mismatch, flagging potentially compromised evidence.

Hash values logged at key points in the preservation process, including post-acquisition, after imaging, and when storing or transferring evidence, can authenticate chain of custody. Storing hashes externally protects against spoofing or manipulation of metadata.

How does tamper-evident packaging help preserve digital evidence?

Tamper-evident bags, seals, and other packaging alert investigators if digital evidence has been accessed or compromised. Features include:

  • Opaque, sturdy materials block viewing or manipulating contents.
  • Unique serial numbers or barcodes track individual items.
  • One-way seals that visually indicate if opened.
  • Fragile security tapes that alter if removed.
  • Embedded dyes or fragrances that are released if bags are cut.

Packaging should undergo frequent inspections for integrity. Any evidence of potential tampering triggers stricter evidence controls and investigations into the chain of custody.

Why should chain of custody documentation closely detail every step?

Thorough chain of custody documentation provides a record of who handled evidence items, when, what was done, and where evidence was stored. Detailed logs help establish key preservation requirements:

  • Custody tracking: Identifies all persons responsible for evidence security.
  • Access monitoring: Records dates, times, and reasons for handling evidence.
  • Activity auditing: Documents investigative and preservation steps taken.
  • Continuity verification: Confirms standardized protocols were followed.
  • Authenticity corroboration: Helps confirm evidence items were not manipulated or substituted.

Careful documentation by objective, trained custodians helps prove proper chain of custody and bolster admissibility. Metadata preservation and hashing provide further corroboration of authenticity and continuity.

What long-term preservation strategies help maintain digital evidence integrity?

Preserving digital evidence through lengthy investigations, appeals, and retention periods requires proactive strategies to keep data accessible and authentic, including:

  • Using standardized file formats and media.
  • Migrating to new storage media as technology changes.
  • Backing up multiple copies in geographically distributed locations.
  • Refreshing and re-certifying media integrity via hashing.
  • Strictly controlling access and handling according to policy.
  • Security measures like encryption, password protection, and access logging.
  • Environmental controls to guard against physical threats like fire, water, and electromagnetic fields.
  • Ongoing monitoring for bit rot and data corruption.

Adhering to these best practices reduces risks over time and provides stronger evidence authenticity claims.

Digital Evidence Type Potential Evidentiary Value Preservation Considerations
Emails
  • Communications content
  • Attachments
  • Email headers
  • Metadata like timestamps
  • Multiple locations to collect from like servers, local clients, cloud accounts
  • Volatile data requiring live acquisition
  • Encryption can obscure messages
Text/Messaging Apps
  • Messages
  • Attachments
  • Location data
  • Timestamps
  • Short retention periods
  • Content encrypted in transit and storage
  • Small screen size limits message length
Social Media
  • Posts and messages
  • Connections
  • Location history
  • Device and login information
  • Quick deletion common
  • Multiple devices used for access
  • Requests required for provider data
Web Browsing History
  • Sites and pages visited
  • Searches
  • Downloaded files
  • User accounts
  • Synced across browsers and devices
  • Stored on both client and servers
  • Private browsing limits collection
Files and Documents
  • Metadata like author and timestamps
  • Revision histories
  • Embedded objects and metadata
  • Deleted versions
  • Encryption and access controls may limit access
  • Cloud storage adds complexity
  • Formats prone to corruption over time
Photos and Videos
  • EXIF data like device, location, timestamps
  • Metadata
  • Deletion does not fully erase
  • Easy to alter with editing tools
  • Can automate facial recognition
  • Storage and sharing sites must be checked

Conclusion

Proper digital evidence preservation is crucial to ensuring complete, authentic, and reliable data that can withstand judicial scrutiny. Investigators and legal teams should follow best practices starting at the earliest stages of an investigation through final disposition and retention. While digital evidence introduces new challenges compared to physical evidence, following rigorous collection, documentation, storage, and long-term maintenance protocols allows its value to be fully realized in the pursuit of justice.