What is considered digital evidence?

Digital evidence, also known as electronic evidence, refers to any data stored or transmitted using a digital device that can be used as evidence in a criminal investigation or legal proceeding. With the proliferation of computers, smartphones, and other digital devices in business and personal life, digital evidence is becoming increasingly important in establishing facts for courts and law enforcement.

Table of Contents

What are some examples of digital evidence?

There are many types of digital evidence that investigators can collect from computers, networks, mobile devices, and the internet. Some common examples include:

Emails

Instant messages (e.g. texts, WhatsApp messages)
Documents and spreadsheets
Images, audio and video files

Internet browsing history and search terms
Database records
Metadata embedded in files that provides information about the file such as dates created/modified, author etc.

Log files that track user activities and access on a system
Deleted files that may still be recoverable
Geotags and GPS data embedded in photos and videos

Essentially any data stored digitally can potentially be used as evidence if it relates to the particular case or investigation. The key is having procedures to preserve the integrity of the data so it can be authentically presented in a court or hearing.

Why is digital evidence important?

Digital evidence has become a crucial consideration in criminal and civil legal matters for several reasons:

Many activities today involve digital devices and online services, leaving an electronic trail that can reveal actions, communications, timelines etc.

Digital evidence can provide insight that is not available through other means e.g. deleted files, online activities, metadata.
In some cases, digital evidence may be the only evidence available if there is no physical evidence or witnesses.
Timestamps, geotagging and other digital artifacts can establish precise timings and locations to build facts.

The volume of digital evidence available means there may be multiple sources that can corroborate and validate facts.
It can provide irrefutable proof of events compared to witness accounts which can be disputed.
Investigators can use digital evidence to reconstruct sequences of events, validate alibies, tie suspects to locations etc.

In many instances today, proving or disproving key facts in a case hinges on the availability of credible digital evidence.

What makes digital data qualify as evidence?

For digital data to be considered valid evidence in legal proceedings, it must meet certain criteria:

Authenticity – There must be proof that the data is genuine and has not been altered or tampered with. The continuity and integrity of the data has been preserved through a documented chain of custody.

Reliability – There are no reasonable doubts about the accuracy and trustworthiness of the digital evidence. The manner in which it was collected, preserved and analyzed meets evidentiary standards.
Relevance – The evidence directly relates to key facts and issues of the case, and is not extraneous or circumstantial.
Completeness – All relevant data that should be included is available. Selective or incomplete evidence can be misleading.

Believability – The evidence does not appear fabricated or manipulated to support a biased version of events.

Additionally, digital evidence must be collected, transported, analyzed and handled properly using forensically sound methods for it to be legally admissible in court.

What are the different types of digital evidence?

Digital evidence can be categorized into three main types:

Application data – This includes data generated by end user applications such as emails, documents, multimedia files, database records etc.
System data – This encompasses data created automatically by operating systems and software to log user activities such as login records, Internet histories, account usage data and more. It provides contextual information for other evidence.
Network data – This type of evidence is derived from network infrastructure and traffic. It involves data such as IP addresses, bandwidth usage, data transfer logs and other attributes of network communications.

Each type of digital evidence has specific recovery, collection and analysis techniques that require specialized expertise and tools to execute correctly.

What are some key requirements for collecting and handling digital evidence?

To ensure digital evidence maintains its integrity and evidentiary value, investigators and legal teams must follow best practices for evidence collection and handling. Some key requirements include:

Following standardized procedures documented in policies to maintain chain of custody records.

Using forensically sound processes that prevent alteration or contamination of data.
Documenting the scene and notable system or application characteristics before collection.
Isolating systems and shutting down processes to prevent remote tampering or destruction of volatile data.

Collecting a bitstream copy of data storage media when possible to allow advanced analysis.
Applying cryptographic hashing algorithms to preserve and authenticate evidence.
Enabling system logging, access controls and encryption on examination systems and media.

Maintaining detailed notes about evidence processing and activities.
Storing evidence securely with limited access to authorized handlers only.

A failure to follow these precautions can make evidence inadmissible, unreliable or ineffective in legal proceedings.

What are some challenges investigators face with digital evidence?

While digital evidence offers many benefits, there are also notable challenges that can hinder investigations:

Encryption – Encrypted data may be impossible to read without passwords or keys that may not be available.
Remote wiping – Devices and drives can be remotely wiped destroying valuable evidence.

Lack of context – Evidence without proper context can lead investigators to incorrect conclusions.
Time constraints – Digital evidence can be temporary and is vulnerable to loss or deletion over time.
Data volume – Huge volumes of data make timely analysis difficult with limited resources.

Technical complexity – Specialized tools and skills are required to properly recover and interpret digital evidence.
Anti-forensics – Criminals use techniques to delete, forge and conceal digital evidence to evade investigators.

Overcoming these challenges often requires assistance from digital forensics specialists and significant time and effort to collect evidence before it is lost.

What are the main sources of digital evidence?

Digital evidence can originate from various sources and devices that people use for communication, browsing, transacting and storing data. The key sources include:

Computers – Desktop, laptop, tablet and handheld computers contain significant evidence in files, system logs and cached information.
Smartphones – Mobile phones generate immense amounts of digital evidence through call logs, text messages, apps, and geolocation data.

Cloud storage – Online cloud accounts contain documents, photos, emails and other files uploaded by users.
Network servers – Servers powering networks host email inboxes, databases, authentication systems that contain evidence.
Removable media – USB drives, memory cards, external hard drives or optical discs may contain files copied from other systems.

IoT devices – Internet connected cameras, TVs, thermostats and other smart gadgets hold video, images and usage data.
Social media – Platforms like Facebook and Twitter have messages, posts, connections and user data valuable to investigations.

Identifying and attempting to collect evidence from all potential sources is a key challenge in digital forensics.

What are some best practices for evidence collection?

Proper acquisition and handling of digital evidence is crucial to preserve evidentiary value. Recommended best practices include:

Documenting hardware and software configurations of systems before evidence collection.
Disconnecting network access and disabling wireless capabilities on devices to isolate them.

Using write blockers when connecting external media to prevent modification.
Taking complete disk images vs. selective file copies when feasible.
Calculating hash values to authenticate copies against original data.

Storing evidence securely in limited access facilities with strict check-in/check-out controls.
Meticulously tracking chain of custody for all evidence throughout the investigative process.
Keeping detailed notes about evidence collection and analysis procedures.

Following evidence handling protocols to maintain integrity and prevent contamination.

These measures help establish that evidence presented in legal settings is in an unaltered state from time of acquisition.

What are some techniques used to analyze digital evidence?

Examining digital evidence involves specialized techniques and tools to extract information relevant to the case. Some common analysis approaches include:

File system analysis – Reviewing file structures, unused space, slack space, and unallocated space to recover deleted content.
Application analysis – Manual inspection or automated processing of contents within databases, email, social media, documents etc.
Metadata analysis – Reviewing timestamps, geotags, authorship data and other metadata associated with files.

Data carving – Using signature analysis to scan raw data and recover files based on specific header/footer values.
Password cracking – Employing wordlists or brute force to access password protected resources.
Network analysis – Inspecting network traffic captures and logs for communications data and patterns.

Mobile forensics – Using physical or logical techniques to extract data from smartphones and mobile devices.

Understanding artifacts that different techniques expose is crucial for drawing accurate conclusions from evidence.

What kind of professionals analyze digital evidence in investigations?

While law enforcement may conduct initial collections, in-depth analysis of digital evidence is typically performed by specialized professionals including:

Digital forensic examiners – Extract, analyze and interpret digital evidence using scientific procedures and tools.
Forensic data analysts – Reconstruct and examine data including emails, files, phone records and communications.
eDiscovery specialists – Assist attorneys in digital evidence collection and legal review for cases.

Incident response teams – Corporate teams that respond to cybersecurity incidents by collecting forensic data from affected systems.
Forensic investigators – Gather and scrutinize digital evidence for clues about crimes, fraud, or other incidents.
Forensic accountants – Investigate white collar crimes involving financial systems, accounting records and complex financial transactions.

Specialized digital forensics teams working closely with legal teams are crucial for handling the unique nature of digital evidence effectively.

What are some key considerations for presenting digital evidence in court?

Using digital evidence effectively in legal proceedings requires attention to specific aspects such as:

Following local laws and protocols for submission and admission of evidence.

Establishing chain of custody, collection methods, transport and storage.
Articulating technical details clearly using easy to understand language and visuals.
Highlighting specifics including timestamps, terminology, identifiers and technical artifacts.

Avoiding unsupported assertions or conclusions about the meaning of evidence.
Citing validation processes used to show reliability and accuracy of analysis.
Outlining qualifications and expertise level of forensic analysts involved.

Discussing limitations, assumptions made, and risks of misinterpretation.

Legal teams should work closely with digital forensics specialists to integrate evidence effectively into their arguments and clearly convey its significance to judges and juries.

What are some examples of how digital evidence made an impact in actual cases?

Here are some real-world instances where digital evidence provided breakthroughs:

Emails and GPS data on location linked Bradley Edwards to murders of Samantha Koenig and others.
Metadata in images proved they were taken with Paul Skiba’s camera, placing him at the murder scene of Lorenzen Wright.
IP addresses tracked down cyberbullying suspects Tyler Barriss and Casey Viner involved in fatal swatting incident.

Deleted WhatsApp messages recovered forensically provided alibi for Gerard Baden-Clay’s murder of his wife.
Electronic toll collection and CCTV footage established Robert Durst’s movements for trial in murder of Susan Berman.
Fitbit health data contradicted Richard Dabate’s version of events in his wife Connie’s murder.

ISP records disproved Brad Cooper’s claim that he was working when his wife Nancy was murdered.

These cases and many more demonstrate the decisive impact digital evidence examination can have in unraveling crimes and resolving legal disputes.

Conclusion

Digital evidence is playing an increasingly pivotal role in the legal system today. With the exponential growth in connected devices and online activities, electronic evidence provides tremendous opportunities to establish facts, reconstruct events, and prove or refute allegations in court. However, for digital evidence to be effective, its collection, handling, examination, and presentation must follow standardized processes that preserve integrity and comply with legal protocols for admissibility. When leveraged competently, digital evidence provides an objective, precise and compelling foundation that can make or break cases in the digital age.